|
|
|
|
|
by bitsm
5508 days ago
|
|
So what's the line on this practice? It does seem to work in out some cases, but entrepreneurs seem to be gaming the system now, which would make this practice a much worse deal for the buying companies. 24 months does seem to be the avg. term, minus let's say, 3 months ramping up and 3 down. Consider weekends and holidays, and companies are not getting much for their dollar. I understand the company's need to compete in an entrepreneurial market, but the investment doesn't seem to be worth it on it's face. Am I missing something? |
|