|
|
|
|
|
by haberman
2004 days ago
|
|
> Everything is just inline, except when messages can be recursive (which should be rare for most protocols). Many messages are have lots of optional sub-message fields, and set only a few of them in any given message. These messages would be huge if everything is inline (especially if the same thing happens in those sub-messages). I agree that inlining all sub-messages works great for dense schemas, but it assumes too much about the schema to be a good design for a general-purpose proto library I think. Also maps and repeated fields can never be inline. |
|
So it's great that there are different implementations for different use cases. It helps that the wire format is simple and well-documented.