The assertion I responded to was that the only way to ensure "quality" was to support government regulation. I disagreed. Using the heavy hand of government to be sure that these toys don't break within a day is overkill. I suggested an alternative
Rather than argue against that specific point, people began arguing against another easier point: that government regulation protects us from dangerous things
While true, it's a distracting non-sequitur. Argue against what I said, not against a stupider argument that I did not say