|
|
|
|
|
by secfirstmd
2003 days ago
|
|
None of what you say aligns with disappearing people. NATO can easily do its role without that. In fact you can argue that NATO states like US/UK/Turkey which have disappeared people are very unlikely to do it against peer adversaries like Russia, China etc because of the risk of blow back. It's far more common to it to groups deemed as terrorist, Latin American countries etc. Similarly countries like Sweden and Japan are well armed and not in the business of disappearing people. |
|
By painting with such broad strokes, we are comparing entirely different types of actions.