[barnacled]

>So you never asked anyone. The problem is, if you ignore ethics, which of course says a lot about your priorities, still two fold.

This is offensive and I suggest you re-read my post (as well as the HN comment guidelines). I am not ignoring ethics, I specifically mention informed consent. I also have no idea what you mean by 'so you never asked anyone' - this is a hypothetical??

>The goal is to get millions vaccinated, not just a few elderly so that some people can go out partying again without feeling bad.

You're also strawmanning me pretty hard here.

> But this small benefit would have caused tremendous issues in a couple of weeks / months.

Not even sure how you come to this conclusion (you seem 100% certain that distributing the now-proven safe mRNA vaccine early would have caused tremendous issues, somehow).

You seem to want to be aggressive to me and strawman me as somebody who doesn't care about covid victims (my grandmother is 85 and has serious comorbidity risks thank you very much) so I am not going to respond further but I suggest you focus on arguments, not insults and dismissive comments. You can go to reddit and much of the rest of the internet for that.

[hef19898]

So we agree to disagree. No problem for me. Regarding distribution, I saw way to many rushed logistics and supply chain initiatives in my life to know how things turn out when people cut corners for some limited early successes. I am happy authorities seem not to do that right now.