|
|
|
|
|
by mytailorisrich
2001 days ago
|
|
The summary in the link means nothing as it does not address the key points: What is meant by "unconditional universal basic income"? How much would it be?
How would it be financed? What are the expected effects? Why would that be 'better' than the existing welfare state schemes in the various EU countries? These are too often not described when discussing UBI or discussed without much facts or data. |
|
Personally, I would like UBI to be tied to GDP per capita, like say 10% of the GDP would be redistributed to every person. It would help to solve the wealth and income inequality problem that causes huge misallocation of resources (for example, EU has twice as many empty apartments than it has homeless people).
IMHO, it is generally better than welfare because it is less overhead and less patronizing. It should replace a portion of existing welfare system. (Things like pensions are often considered welfare but they are really not.)