|
|
|
|
|
by avalys
2002 days ago
|
|
That's because "character flaws" on a personal level are often required to achieve exceptional results. Not sufficient. But often required. If Jobs were a quiet, contemplative, respectful person who was careful to keep track of where he heard what idea and assign credit where credit was due - it's unlikely we'd have Apple. That's just a different personality type. |
|
Character flaws are often associated with certain effective traits, but are not chained to them.
In your example, one can be vocal, biased-twoards-action, and low-bullshit, while also giving credit where credit is due.
I think it’s far from obvious that Jobs would have been a less effective leader if he had addressed his character shortcomings.
I similarly feel the same way about current leaders like Musk. He could do some inner work, become far less of a jerk, and be equally or more effective.