Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Alupis 1997 days ago
That is a debate worth having - but calling cheaply paid prison labor "Slave Labor", or equivocating it to Chinese Forced Labor Camps is disingenuous and dishonest.

They are flatly not the same, even if you believe it's debatably exploitive.
1 comments
arentyouspecial 1997 days ago
Considering the rise of convict leasing programs across the south after the passing of the 13th amendment, I’d say there was very little difference.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convict_leasing

link
Alupis 1997 days ago
> The practice peaked around 1880, was formally outlawed by the last state (Alabama) in 1928, and persisted in various forms until it was abolished by President Franklin D. Roosevelt via Francis Biddle's "Circular 3591" of December 12, 1941.

You use something that was ended (because people thought it was wrong!) nearly a century ago as supporting evidence for what exactly?

link
arentyouspecial 1997 days ago
It wouldn’t be like paying prisoners literal pennies is a way of getting around the law that made convict leasing illegal.
link
Alupis 1997 days ago
Convict Leasing is different, and people felt strongly enough that it was bad that the laws were changed (nearly 100 years ago!).

Now the prisoners can get paid some wages in return for labor, in a mostly voluntary labor system.

Unlike the CCP, every inmate had a trial and was found guilty of some crime, and is now repaying their debt to society - as it were.

What did the million Muslims in the article get convicted of in China? Being Muslims? What about the Uyghurs? So now they are slaves for the rest of their lives...

link
arentyouspecial 1997 days ago
Yes we all know how fair and just the American criminal system is and paying pennies is vastly different than paying nothing.
link