[phoe-krk]

> Fully canonically, :: is 0000:0000:0000:000:0000:0000:0000:0000.

Nitpick: missed a single zero in the middle there.

[skissane]

The following comment "My apologies to trypophobic readers" makes me think that the mistake was intentional.

[dave_universetf]

It wasn't, but I'm glad to have plausible deniability :) I fixed the typo.

[Dagger2]

Bigger nitpick: as per RFC 5952, canonically :: is ::. 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 is a valid way of writing the same address, but it's not the canonical way.

[egocentric]

You are a hero