|
|
|
|
|
by sokoloff
2006 days ago
|
|
kg matters a lot, of course, but most airplanes are out of space for additional tankage as currently designed. (They are designed for a given mount of fuel capacity volume, in relation to the mass of that fuel volume. None would have a 4x multiple.) Scaling volumetric storage by a factor of four produces about 2.5x the wetted frontal area (4 ^ (2/3)) |
|
I would agree there’s a likely range reduction, but I don’t have any stats on current normal fueling as a percent of max capacity (iow: are there many routes that are running more than half full today?)