[turtles_]

I get the sentiment but please don't make this a thing. You probably already understand that superresolution can only invent a plausible upscaling, no extra information is gained from the pixels - but the general public don't know this. I really think we should be cautious about normalising the use of such tools for conducting forensics on photos.

[mkl]

It sounds like you're referring to machine learning based superresolution? Superresolution by aligning and combining images involves a lot more pixels in total, and so more information.

[ollifi]

Can you elaborate on this? If you have multiple frames where the target has moved around and you line up the images couldn’t we get single image with more information?

[drjasonharrison]

Yes. But often "multiple" means tens of images and "moved around" does not include video compression where features are moved between frames.

https://m.dpreview.com/articles/0727694641/here-s-how-to-pix...