|
|
|
|
|
|
by mooreed
2001 days ago
|
|
|
What is the fate of `dl-youtube` with respect to this legislation?? I don't see any discussion in the thread - and find that the recent dust up over this type of DRM gray area use is more than correlated with this type of new legislation. After the obligatory IANAL [1]: the fate of `dl-youtube` would be tied to your ability to construe `dl-youtube` as a digital transmission service based on §2319C.a.2. To me seems like the the risky clauses of §2319C.a.2 are : `primary purpose` and `publicly performing`; where primary purpose is tough because their is author intent, and then the proportions of real-world usage, and `publicly performing` is actually a pointer not to common usage of the phrase, but to definitions set forth later in the document. Read the actual law [PDF]: https://www.tillis.senate.gov/services/files/A30B0C08-FB97-4...) [1] - I Am Not A Lawyer |
|
|