The funny thing is that I agree with you that there are a lot of bad pop-sci articles that are misleading in the ways you're talking about. This particular article just isn't one of them.
Even though it's light on detail, I'm actually impressed at how measured & factual it is. They even managed to resist a clickbait headline.
Even though it's light on detail, I'm actually impressed at how measured & factual it is. They even managed to resist a clickbait headline.