|
|
|
|
|
|
by simo7
2010 days ago
|
|
|
> They actually do serve the same purpose. The purpose is communication You just said that a name, definition, question and assertion all serve the same purpose and can be used interchangeably...I mean what else can I say? Exactly. It was a nice exchange nonetheless but at this point it really looks like you hit a dead end. |
|
|
They can be used interchangeably similar to how people can choose to be wrong, right, stupid or smart. The ability to interchange techniques is irrelevant to my point. I am simply responding to a misguided concept stated by you.
A longer phrase can be used interchangeably with a shorter name. The longer phrase is superior to your misguided opinion on using shorter and as a result uninformative names. Donald Knuth agrees.
I am saying your way is the categorically wrong and worse way. You can't respond to this because you got nothing left to say. You're tongue tied.
>Exactly
Yeah you're exactly wrong.
>It was a nice exchange nonetheless but at this point it really looks like you hit a dead end.
Literally I have reams and reams of evidence, deconstructing each of your points and tearing apart every statement you made. You only have the capacity to respond to one teeny tiny snippet of what I wrote and your response is still misguided.
I'm sorry, but the dead end is you.