Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by concreteblock 2006 days ago
> I’d propose, if you actually understand the program well enough to critique, to contribute something to convince the rest of us that it is a worthwhile intellectual endeavor.

What if the commenter doesn't have time or expertise to do that? Isn't it better to at least state that the OP wrote something very inaccurate? Or should we just give up and let the misconceptions propogate?