|
|
|
|
|
by hn_throwaway_99
2011 days ago
|
|
But crimes of mere "possession" (e.g. child pornography, drugs) are especially susceptible to framing because the existence of the contraband in a person's personal effects are all that is needed to presume guilt. Child pornography, or really any digital asset, is doubly suspect because it is so much easier to "place" these digital assets on someone's computer or phone, whereas with drugs you'd need physical access to someone's home or personal effects. |
|
Sigh - you can't trust cops even with physical possession and cameras rolling [1].
[1]: https://www.topic.com/runningfromcops