|
|
|
|
|
|
by newacct583
2007 days ago
|
|
|
> A continuation after the initial error is hard to explain other than by deliberate personal moral failure. No, just denial: Look, it's a safe plane. We know it's a safe plane. Sure, it's not exactly like the earlier model, but those rules are needlessly strict. This plane is better, we know it's better. And pilots aren't idiots. They'll figure it out. As we all learned, there's no single feature you can point to in the MAX that was a bad engineering decision in isolation. So if you don't want to see bad engineering, you don't have to. |
|
|