[eloff]

> I don't really care nothing that anyone will say is going to change your mind anyhow

I already changed my mind, you just have reading comprehension issues apparently.

> Dude you are trying to discredit cited wiki and you brought a non-statement single page that aggregates Chinese sources from beginning of a year.

I'm arguing that China was the first country to propose that treatment using HCQ might be effective. I'm NOT arguing that it is effective. I'm merely supporting my statement about the timeline which someone challenged with a wikipedia link. Someone called that false, and it's not - it's history.

> The conclusion of your 'evidence' is a call to do trials.

Work on that reading comprehension, I never called it evidence of efficacy.

[me_me_me]

Then why the hell are you still taking?

HCQ is not effective and that's the conclusve statement. Who cares that back in jan some kooks tried to be famous based on non blinded study on 10 patients?