I'm actively looking at alternatives. I knew about these issues when they were first revealed a month or so ago, but this just reminds me to actually use something. I'm considering SpiderOak.
I moved to SpiderOak a few weeks ago when this came up first.
Still need a lot of improvement but It's good. Built on different philosophy, so the workflow is slightly different, however in some areas (what to backup, what to sync and how) has more flexibility.
One missing feature is syncing directories with others. Probably the architecture that gives the security makes this a difficult task.
To compensate for that, there's a pretty good feature of web-share. Can share anything you backed up, with a separate password that you can revoke any time.
So in the end: I keep Dropbox but removed most of my files from there, started with SpiderOak, and playing with AeroFS (similar functionality on peer-to-peer architecture).
Still need a lot of improvement but It's good. Built on different philosophy, so the workflow is slightly different, however in some areas (what to backup, what to sync and how) has more flexibility.
One missing feature is syncing directories with others. Probably the architecture that gives the security makes this a difficult task.
To compensate for that, there's a pretty good feature of web-share. Can share anything you backed up, with a separate password that you can revoke any time.
So in the end: I keep Dropbox but removed most of my files from there, started with SpiderOak, and playing with AeroFS (similar functionality on peer-to-peer architecture).