|
|
|
|
|
by mads_ravn
2008 days ago
|
|
Quoting from the article > The report states that the main factor in the problems in residential homes for the elderly was simply the fact the virus spread so widely in society. With regards to the difference in strategy, there has been analysis like this https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7227592/ Finally, and this is just a common sense argument, I believe it is clear that avoiding social interaction will slow transmission of airborne diseases. And lockdowns decrease social interactions (to a much higher degree than simple recommendations) |
|
In other words I will argue, that one would expect Denmark to have been hit harder, but there is one fifth the deaths per capita.
And I’m sorry that I am ranting, but this disease has caused so much dead and suffering, when it could have been stopped if we took it seriously - this upsets me. I was talking with a friend living in Taiwan and they’ve had ~750 cases in total with aggressive tracing and isolation tactics, so we know it is possible.