| It doesn't have much to do with age. It's the same problem as the "both sides" approach to anything [0] ("my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"). This inherently just moves the problem to decide who's informed (or equivalently what's the required level of "informedness"). Many jurisdictions routinely suspend people's voting rights. Due process and all. Of course when it comes to giving them back after they've served their sentence the process somehow slows down. So I'm fully aware of the downsides of this. I'm not advocating for doing that to any concrete group of people, I'm advocating for working on this problem. It's not the first time this has come up in history, nor the last. The long term solution is education. Yes. Is there even a short-term solution? Maybe not. However I'm interested in the details of best arguments for and against. And I'm not convinced at all that just because someone is older than X years they now have to be "trusted". After all we should protect elderly people from bad information too, they seem to live their second childhood. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGArqoF0TpQ |