|
|
|
|
|
by danpalmer
2012 days ago
|
|
> It's perhaps worrying given how low-hanging some of these fruit are - i.e. "Do we have the right patient?" It turns out that while it's a good idea to check things this "low-hanging", the value is far larger than catching wrong patients, so don't worry too much! Much of the value comes from essentially disrupting routine with an opportunity to stop, and from creating a culture of speaking up. I think the NHS was the organisation to trial having the nurse run the checklist, which had the effect of empowering the "lowest level" person in the operating theatre. Studies showed that even just having everyone in the room speak once increased the chance of subsequent communication, and ultimately improved patient outcomes. Atul Gawande was one of the key people in designing and rolling out these checklists and wrote a book about it that I'd recommend – The Checklist Manifesto. |
|