[lmm]

I understand there's a good chance the next standard will specify that signed integer overflow results in an unspecified value, which would match the behaviour of older compilers and what (IME) most programmers tend to expect.

[steerablesafe]

> I understand there's a good chance the next standard will specify that signed integer overflow results in an unspecified value

Do you have a source for this?

[lmm]

It was linked from a discussion on HN but I didn't record where.