|
|
|
|
|
|
by Dr_Emann
2008 days ago
|
|
|
I would absolutely support something to replace ((((a).b).c).d).e with a->b->c->d->e, regardless of how much code had been written without that feature. Do you not like the array subscript operator, either, since a[b] can be *(a+b)? How about a && b, you can replace that with (!!a) & (!!b), with an extra 'if' if you need the short circuiting. |
|
|