|
|
|
|
|
by staffanj
2016 days ago
|
|
How is this possible? I know the Apple M1 is fast but against a 3900X? Is it mostly storage and memory affecting the results? (doesn't say what storage Ryzen uses). I mean - I still have a hard time believing that a M1 can outperform a Ryzen 3900X if they benchmark something that uses the CPU 100% for a while - like raytracing. Or do x86 just suck and we found out now when something else came out? |
|
For the current generation (which is almost impossible to buy) it's a push.
For multi-core workloads (mostly niche use cases) high core count processors perform better.
I assume when the M1x comes out, it will similarly dominate the multi-core workloads, if it does have the rumored 32 cores.