[kfrzcode]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

But even ordinary claims require ordinary evidence.

The burden of proof is on the claimant, not the defendant. I believe that's the point parent was addressing.

[nobody9999]

>The burden of proof is on the claimant, not the defendant. I believe that's the point parent was addressing.

Absolutely. I was pointing out that in this specific case (whether or not devices connected to the internet can be secured), the converse is also true.