|
|
|
|
|
by Silhouette
2019 days ago
|
|
Which ones are actual attacks, and which are just poorly-made crawlers? If it walks like an attack and it quacks like an attack... I am lacking in sympathy for the perp here, as being careless like this has probably caused problems and possibly cost significant money for a lot of people. However, this is also a compelling demonstration of why cloud services should be required to provide a hard price cap option for safety reasons. I've heard all the self-serving arguments they make about how turning things off surprisingly might be unwanted behaviour and so on. If that's the case, the admin won't set a cap. But there are exactly zero circumstances under which someone who intended to cap their usage at a level that would cost single digits of dollars or remain within a free plan intends or wants to run something that costs four orders of magnitude more than that, and IMNSHO such predatory pricing models should be illegal (assuming that the charges aren't already considered unenforceable by courts under such circumstances; I haven't checked). |
|