Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throwaway32 5514 days ago
However bitcoin does pose a threat to the banking elite and their congressional lapdogs. A crackdown is comming soon unfortunately.
2 comments

Not likely - they simply don't understand it at all. P2P? Cryptocurrency?, hash collisions?, proof of work?, public private key encryption?

By the time they have gotten around to see this as anything worth wasting time on, bitcoins have either court on or have completely disappeared (most likely the latter, sadly).

To mutilate a phrase Congress is not webscale, threats cannot be discovered, assessed and lobbied about fast enough to out-compete technology. And technology isn't going to get any slower.

They do employ masses of quants, though, who can chew through this sort thing quite easily.
>A crackdown is comming soon unfortunately.

Is that just conjecture or do you have some evidence?

I hold bitcoin and expect it to prosper in time; I also expect a crackdown if it does succeed, but I would be very surprised to see anything soon.

It's hard for them to touch: the existing currency laws certainly don't apply. The more-likely scenario of them becoming stores of value and/or securities (legally speaking) gives them little room for enforcement as there is no central issuing party to go after.

I think the most likely crackdown will happen at the exchange level; but the only major one is in Japan, with new ones popping up everywhere within 6 months.

Honestly, the market is so small right now I would expect nefarious market manipulation as the main course of action for at least another order-of-magnitude growth in bitcoins market cap.

> It's hard for them to touch: the existing currency laws certainly don't apply. The more-likely scenario of them becoming stores of value and/or securities (legally speaking) gives them little room for enforcement as there is no central issuing party to go after.

The lack of a central issuing party isn't a problem - they can go after any point that converts them to get "real money" or provides goods subject to control.

Physical goods are a subset of the latter.

If you can't buy food or pay rent with Bitcoin, how much can it catch on?

Actually, bitcoins being classified as securities might make it easier for governments to crack down on them: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1817857

Securities are more closely regulated than commodities in the US. I'm not sure what the laws are in Japan, where Mt. Gox is located, but I expect they could find some legal pretense to raid the exchange. There may be more exchanges popping up all the time, but almost everyone uses Mt. Gox. As a result, they're holding a huge amount of bitcoins and digital cash. That makes it a major target for a raid.

I wonder if they will start keeping backup servers in multiple countries, like Wikileaks? I'm not sure if that would protect peoples' digital cash, but their bitcoins would be safe in the event of a raid on the main server.

Hm, what do you mean by 'main server'?
Wherever Mt. Gox is storing people's bitcoins (the exchange's wallet.dat) and their deposits in USD and EUR, as well as wherever trades, deposits, and - especially - withdrawals are processed. Lots of people have large non-bitcoin deposits in the exchange, and if a raid on a small number of locations in Japan can prevent them from withdrawing or result in their money being seized, that's a serious issue for the bitcoin project as a whole.

Edit: Also, it looks like Mutum Sigillum LLC, the company that processes Mt. Gox's deposits and withdrawals through Dwolla, is incorporated in Delaware. I wonder if they process those transactions in the US?