|
|
|
|
|
|
by Talanes
2019 days ago
|
|
|
>Cracking down on anti-election rhetoric is an obvious net positive, and needs no further explanation. Yes, it does. Cracking down on speech would further enrage all those people, while also pissing off a great deal more. I think riots are a more likely outcome of your solution than anything positive. |
|
|
I mean, I can say "boogieman" too and leave the discussion, pretending to have made a point. It will encourage socialism, or it will destroy freedom, or it will encourage censorship! (Etc. Etc). Come on, just stating a boogieman doesn't help anyone's point of view.
No offense to you personally, but a one sentence assertion is not an argument I'll take seriously. Your contribution to this discussion so far has been less than mine. How about you elaborate your points a bit more?
------
But whatever, I'll mirror you, so you see how stupid this gets if you just do one sentence assertions of boogiemen.
Your point of view will destroy democracy.
Ball is in your court now. Figure out a way to elevate the discussion. I'm not doing the heavy lifting unless I see some work from you as well.