|
|
|
|
|
|
by gnusty_gnurc
2014 days ago
|
|
|
The whole point is the sanctimonious, heavy-handed nature of a platform that otherwise likes to act like they're concerned about the public good. I recognize they have a right to do it, but I have a right to make noise about it and criticize them. We got so many pop-ups, accounts suspended, etc. around the Hunter Biden stuff, and what do you know - it turns out there was substance to the story. This never happened around the Russian collusion stuff and I suspect most of the city lib elite that inhabits tech companies wouldn't find that a sanctimonious. |
|
|
Nobody suggested otherwise, and your statement that "you're not interested in free speech unless you're willing to defend speech you find repugnant" is clearly a sidestep. You can support free speech without supporting the nonexistent (and unrelated) right to post lies on Youtube.