[jimsteinhart]

Actually this should be called Img to HTML 3.2

[pbhjpbhj]

Indeed, I assumed it was going to be inline base64 encoded background image or something that wasn't being stripped by MUA.

It's clever for sure.

[dwwoelfel]

Hey! I think you're in the wrong place for table-bashing :)

There used to be more CSS when I was using unordered lists, but it turns out that tables make for a much smaller file size.