| A) >>>Specific examples are pennsylvania allowing absentee ballot 3 days after the election even though by law any ballots arriving by mail after election day are void.<<<< That is incorrect. PA Supreme Court ruled that there is no specific law against that ...Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month..... [1] B) >>>poll watchers who monitor votes being counted were not given meaningful access to monitor even though by law they must be given access.<<< That is also incorrect. The dispute was about how far away they should be. Both Democratic and Republican observers were at the same distance which was at least 6 feet because of COVID. One of the Judges allowed for the distance to be narrowed for everybody C) >>>Due to the huge number of absentee ballots election counters did not verify ballot signatures as required.<<< That is also incorrect. Where state law mandated it, this was done. D) >>>The reason all these lawsuits failed is because there is no real injunctive relief you can seek. <<<< This is incorrect. The lawsuits failed because a) the lawyers actually stated in court that they were not alleging fraud but were 'concerned' b) the lawyers said in court that there were some irregularities but not enough to change the outcome 1. https://www.npr.org/2020/10/19/922411176/supreme-court-rules... |
I get the appeal of getting sucked into partisanship. Your comment reads like someone who has a conclusion and is searching for evidence.
Specifically to your claim about Pennsylvania mail in ballots see below.
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/li/uconsCheck.cfm...
Act 77 of Pennsylvania law:
"a completed mail-in ballot must be received in the office of the county board of elections no later than eight o'clock P.M. on the day of the primary or election."