|
|
|
|
|
|
by zucker42
2019 days ago
|
|
|
> The argument is that they have become large and commonly used enough that they are akin to a public utility. While this is an interesting conversation, you don't even have to go this far. You can just argue that rebutting bad ideas is more effective than censoring them and a good video hosting platform should value open discourse, and so YouTube should try to be as content-neutral as possible. If you convince enough YouTube users that open discourse is more important than censoring perceived falsehoods, then it might make more sense for YouTube to commit itself to open discourse. |
|
|