|
|
|
|
|
|
by mobileexpert
2019 days ago
|
|
|
The CSAM numbers are presented awkwardly. The FB numbers suggest FB is way worse, but the FB and Twitter numbers are platform reported rather than externally identified. FB and Twitter make more reports and publish more transparently. I’d also wager that reports = (all content #)(prevalence rate of CSAM)(detection sensitivity)*(reporting rate) and FB/TWTR probably have infinitely higher first terms, and better 3 and 4th terms in the equation. |
|
|