[cpncrunch]

>Why does why she was fired relevant?

It's not. I never even mentioned that. The article was supporting my comment above by showing the emails between the state epidemiologist and her dept. I havent found any better source for those emails.

>Also your article goes literally against what you said.

No, it doesn't, if you read the article you will see it supports the facts I gave (see my other comment in this thread).