[gzer0]

Posting this purely because of the hypocrisy displayed by the poster, Cambalache. Your arguments attempt (very poorly) to appeal to ethos, are littered with false equivocations, and jump to illogical, impossible conclusions based on flawed logic defined earlier in your "argument".

> You cannot publish it if you don't own the rights

Who gave YOU the right to take away MY ability to publish anything? Stay consistent with your arguments, at least.

> same way you cannot enter my house if you are not invited

Who gave YOU the right to take away MY right and freedom to enter a place?

----

Often times, when you find someone making such absurd claims, you must argue back with the same nonsense logic they use otherwise there will be no end

Would love to hear your answers to the above points I made please and thanks.

[etchalon]

Your post amounts to asking "Who gave YOU the right to tell ME I can't fire my GUN wherever I want".

There are no good answers to a point that absurd.

[gzer0]

> Your post amounts to asking "Who gave YOU the right to tell ME I can't fire my GUN wherever I want". There are no good answers to a point that absurd.

> Often times, when you find someone making such absurd claims, you must argue back with the same nonsense logic they use otherwise there will be no end

---

Thanks for proving my point!

[cambalache]

Sorry I got confused. I have no idea what you think "ethos" means. From there my mind wandered. Peace!

[gzer0]

> Often times, when you find someone making such absurd claims, you must argue back with the same nonsense logic they use otherwise there will be no end

amazing! my technique works, as per usual. :) thanks for proving my point.