|
|
|
|
|
|
by PKop
2017 days ago
|
|
|
This is the entire crux of the article's critique of first-principles (axiomatic) thinking being a full-proof way to guide decision-making. The inability to logically prove that first principles comport with, or not, (some unknown) aspect of reality due to missing information. "The map is not the territory", "unknown unknowns" come to mind... |
|
|