[boomboomsubban]

>Contrary to what Weinberger said, a 64-page NAS document is available at

That tweet was made before the report was released, but there were a few press stories about it. The second thread opens with a link to the report.

>Peer review is a BS credibility threshold that validates tons of garbage research in a way that financially benefits publications.

And this paper is of such low quality they couldn't even manage that. It has no merits, and even the paper admits the data is shit and the conclusion is unfounded.