|
|
|
|
|
by _y5hn
2019 days ago
|
|
The best rebuttal so far has been to decline to comment. However, without revealing names the paper outlines internal company matters, presenting opinions and tautology that do not fit proper format of professionally published research. Instead of reworking a flawed paper, the researcher escalated and exposed individual opinion, publicly. Such company representation is out of scope for research positions. As Google could not agree to terms of email, it was taken as resignation notice. |
|