|
|
|
|
|
by shakow
2018 days ago
|
|
> It’s really not abnormal to have to include parens after a method name in a language That's not what he means. Assuming some pseudocode with a more common syntax to prune the parentheses question, Common lisp is doing this: function f(x) { print(x) }
let a = f
funcall(a)(27) # prints 27
Whereas Scheme is doing this: function f(x) { print(x) }
let a = f
a(27) # also prints 27
This is the fundamental difference between so-called Lisp-1 and Lisp-2 families, depending on whether functions and variable share the same namespace or if they have to be “lifted” from one to another through funcall. |
|