| > The front page alone is 9MB. I don't understand how people think this is damning with no further context, especially on a forum presumably full of technical people. Virtually all of that (>9MB) are its gifs. 9MB of dozens of analytics.js files? Sure, awful. 9MB of gifs and <1000KB of html/css on a landing page? Who cares. Btw, for lack of a kinder word off the top of my head, your rant about some images on the landing page is very juvenile. The tone of "hmm, it would be a shame if your design choices made me assume you were technically incompetent and a waste of my time :/" is really toxic. Everyone here would understand what you mean if you just said the landing page was over the top for you. Fine. OP would know that a bold design to be divisive. And frankly some self-awareness on your part would help temper your reaction here instead of dramatizing it and sounding wounded. Similarly, claiming that a project interested you but you couldn't even get past a landing page because it had some gifs is really just your loss, not anybody else's. Once again, had you just said "I wish there was a more informative page" (which is certainly a fair ask), someone could have linked you to https://docs.radicle.xyz/docs/what-is-radicle.html. I know that now it seems like I'm the one overreacting, but your comment has some tropes of really bad communication habits that we tend to think are just part of internet discourse, but they aren't doing you justice. |
I care. Wasting other people's resources is bad manners and contributes to a culture where waste is acceptable.
> waste of my time :/" is really toxic.
It was honest feedback. If others feel the same way the product marketing team is making a potentially serious mistake. Give me info, not anime android animations. It wasn't toxic.
> but you couldn't even get past a landing page because it had some gifs is really just your loss, not anybody else's.
If other people feel the same way, it very definitely stops being my problem and becomes the product's problem as people get turned off it. That was a core point you missed.
> could have linked you to https://docs.radicle.xyz/docs/what-is-radicle.html.
Why in your view was this not on the front page at the top?
(edit, and see this link & earlier reply https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25321788)
> but your comment ... but they aren't doing you justice
Thanks (genuinely) but I stand by this. It said what was wrong (IMO). it said what I wanted (again IMO), it was honest if blunt feedback the marketeers could use to decide if my point had merit (if they can admit they might have been wrong).
We differ but I appreciate your constructive feedback.