Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sushshshsh 2014 days ago
I'll code you a competitor for much less than that person would charge, if they are even willing to sell :)
2 comments

I assume that this was a tongue in cheek comment, but in case it wasn’t...

The site code and content itself is worth very little. The history, traffic, and back links are the value.

Even if the site was copied or even improved on, it would take somewhere between 6 to 24 months to reach a comparable level of traffic assuming no black hat strategies are used.

Why would someone pay a 4x multiple on a site that probably wont be making anything 4 years from now? (4x being a rough estimate of the buying price).

That's 40 grand that could be used on traffic to the new site

Hmmmm...

1. 4x ~$4600 annual revenue = $18400, a far cry from 40 grand.

2. I seriously doubt that this site will be making $0 in four years. My vote is for the over by a lot.

3. Most folks who would purchase it at a 4x annual revenue multiple would have a clear plan to increase traffic and/or monetize the traffic more efficiently than the current owner does.

Speaking for myself, buying existing traffic is like printing money for me. Most people do not monetize their traffic very well at all. That said, getting white hat traffic from scratch is a slow and tedious process.

they want the traffic and recurring revenue, they don't care about the site
How'd that work out for fox when they bought myspace?
Well if we're going to ignore all of the variables in this manner it seems to be doing them super well, they're still in business!
comparing multimillion dollar sites with niche sites is pointless
Despite the failure, I'm guessing somewhat better than if they had hired you to make a clone?