|
|
|
|
|
by leeuw01
2024 days ago
|
|
Thanks for the reply! A while ago (2018), the people behind VIATRA performed a cross-technology benchmark where they compared their performance to 9 other incremental and non-incremental solutions (Neo4j, Drools, OCL, SQLite, MySQL, among others) [1]. Perhaps it could be interesting to rerun that benchmark while including Materialize? This would give us a direct comparison between Materialize and other existing solutions. Their benchmark is however based on a kind of UX case, so the tests might be a bit biased towards that use case. [1] The Train Benchmark: cross-technology performance evaluation of continuous model queries |
|