[mpalmer]

I certainly recognize your attempt to reframe your previous comments as actually addressing the content of the article, even though they were mostly "sure there's [this], but what about [not this]?".

Talking about an article's "undertone" and "what it's designed to do" as though those things are not completely subjective simply does not convince.

And thank you very much for the laugh you gave me when you compared D&D scaremongering to the literal exploitation of children.