[silicon2401]

With statements like this, I can't help but wonder what the person's background is. Not to make an ad hominem, but because the stance seems simply unaware of the realities of life for a lot of people. I've lived in Baltimore, where simply walking around can be extremely dangerous. I also had friends growing up who couldn't afford to pay for bus rides in our hometown (which were less than $2).

If walking to the library literally entails putting your life and property at risk, and you can't afford public transportation, how would you not consider that somebody being excluded just due to not having internet at home?