| > Bitcoin has not proven market value beyond a speculative instrument and a vehicle for financial crime. In particular, it has failed in its original goal to be peer-to-peer electronic cash. Very much has. Wild speculation moved on from bitcoin to altcoins circa 2015, from altcoins to ico in 2017 and from ico to defi in 2019. Bitcoin is old and boring. Vehicle for financial crime - that’s just ridiculous, not even bothering to respond. Go google what fines banks paid in recent decade for financial crimes before claiming this bs. And bitcoin is p2p cash for all intents and purposes. Ticks all the boxes for me. > people in the market to buy cannot easily get more of the thing that they want Yeah, you can’t get more bitcoin, it’s scarce. > For people just wanting to speculate, other cryptocurrencies are substitutable. Well that’s a dumb definition of scarcity, unless you also think gold isn’t scarce because there are tons of substitute metals for purposes of speculation on the market. |
I appreciate you not responding on crime, as that saves me some time.
I can believe Bitcoin "ticks the boxes" for ardent Bitcoin fans, but that doesn't say much about the rest of the world. Bitcoin did not end up being cash in the common sense of the term. E.g.: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/16/nyregion/new-york-today-l...
For speculation, yes, some metals are substitutable. Silver is a popular alternative to gold. To a lesser extent, platinum, palladium, and rhodium. If you don't believe me, just go look at some of the sites and vendors that cater to gold bugs. And I'll note that Bitcoin has often been called "digital gold" and has drawn plenty of interest from the same kinds of people who speculate in gold, so Bitcoin can also be a substitute.