Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by RobAley 2026 days ago
> Why don’t we

Because we don't need to and we have much more interesting problems to take up our time.

1 comments

But GP already solved the problem (at least for English and other Latin script languages). Why throw away those findings?
Problems tend to have more than one solution. GP's solution should be documented, yes, but the alternate solution that won out was computers being capable of storing a million words or so in plaintext very easily, and doing the same using their compression scheme just isn't really worth the space saved nowadays.
Also, compressing could actually be slower for modern computers. Remember when compressing your hard disk made your PC faster, up until disks became faster, then it actually made it slower?

Today's CPUs are very fast, so the trend could have flipped again, that would be an interesting benchmark.

Implementation takes time. Keep it simple and move on.