Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cont4gious 5519 days ago
Is the source/a paper/a blog post going to be released so that we can look at (read: poke holes in) it?
1 comments
jerf 5519 days ago
It's not like there's a "right" or "wrong" answer. It's more art than code, and what really matters is the final result.
link
cont4gious 5519 days ago
i completely agree. i didn't mean that it would in any way be wrong, i am just really interested in how they did it, and wanted to look at the source.

yet another example of a need for a sarcasm punctuation mark.

link
jrockway 5519 days ago
Why would you add the parenthetical statement "read: poke holes in" if you were "really interested in how they did it"? Not only does it not really make sense (how do you "poke holes" in art?), it makes you sound like a dick.
link
Dylan16807 5519 days ago
Why is poking holes automatically negative?
link