[fhrow4484]

> but at the same time not realizing that it's unethical to withhold what she did

Have you considered that she has to remain vague due to the potential litigation coming down the road? In fact didn't she leave some tweets hinting at that ? ("Everything I say will be used against me ..." ?)

[SpicyLemonZest]

I can't imagine a reason that she'd be free to say Google fired her because of her demands, free to post the termination email, but not free to say what her demands were.

[hezag]

Because the demands are related to some internal project covered by a NDA, maybe?

[SpicyLemonZest]

That's fair. (Although I've gotta selfishly hope that if that's true it won't stop people from leaking the email.)