Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rwdim 2024 days ago
I’ve had code stolen by an employee who used it to start a competing service. I sued him in Federal court and won.

You didn’t have your code stolen.

Your code was free and open, and the header he removed stated that fact.

What you had was a violation of your terms of use, and I while I agree the guy’s probably a scumbag, the only issue here is that he was seen doing it.

Rest assured, others have done it without being seen, it’s a fact of life for a public code repo.

I suggest you:

(a) change “copywrite” to “copyright” in your code, since a copywrite is someone who writes stories, and a copyright is a legal term claiming ownership;

(b) file a dmca takedown notice with github; I run a hosting service and when we receive those, we take action;

(c) move on. Life’s too short, and all he has to do is republish it to another repo and keep you angry and not working on your code.

(d) actually file a copyright with your code so that he doesn’t do it then sue you for using his code;

I feel for you, but scumbags are what they are and there’s not much you can do about it unless you spend a ton of money to find and file a suit against him that you will probably not win.

My condolences.

2 comments

> Your code was free and open, and the header he removed stated that fact

The header in the source code from the author's site says:

  // This software is the beta version of bwfForum.  It is free for
  // you to use.  You may not modify any of the PHP code without
  // the author's permission.  You may modify the configuration file
  // as needed to get bwfForum to run as designed on your computer.
  // You may not sell or redistribute bwfForum without the author's 
  // permission.  If you would like to use bwfForum on your website,
That's not free and open.
b: The author did file a DMCA takedown notice. The issue in this case is that the GitHub user filed a DMCA counter notification which states they have a good faith believe the takedown is incorrect or invalid (under penalty of perjury). I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me that the GitHub user may have perjured themself.

d: One does not need to file any documents in order to have a copyright over a work in the US, it is an automatic right given to creators over their original works. Authors do, however, need to file with the Copyright Office before suing for copyright infringement.